High-Leverage Execution
Prioritize one high-leverage outcome—often revenue, shipping, or the hardest meaningful task—rather than optimizing for busyness.
34%
Best tweets about Productivity
A curated collection of the sharpest, most-shared X posts about productivity—saved so you do not have to dig through the timeline yourself. Updated weekly.
Systems people actually kept using past week two, not just the aesthetic ones.
Original Xholic analysis
The feed repeatedly favors small, execution-oriented practices: select a consequential task, protect attention, externalize tasks or context, and use a lightweight review rhythm. AI posts range from structured second brains and workflow automation to cautions that tool complexity and automation should be judged by the output they support. These are recurring viewpoints in the 50-post set, not evidence that any system was retained past a particular period. Evidence: 2029004731373306138, 2040256090147868938, 2045073871238320220, 2056359292522168812.
70% of posts
All-time engagement
42% of posts
Published in 90 days
Conversation map
Prioritize one high-leverage outcome—often revenue, shipping, or the hardest meaningful task—rather than optimizing for busyness.
34%
Use lightweight planning rhythms: choose priorities ahead of time, time-block or theme work, and review weekly or in short sprints.
32%
Protect uninterrupted focus through notification barriers, device-free starts, deep-work blocks, and environments designed to reduce distraction.
28%
Apply AI agents and automation to turn messy inputs into actions, preserve working context, generate deliverables, and eliminate repetitive workflows.
26%
Improve throughput by finding bottlenecks, cutting low-value complexity, automating repetition, documenting reusable processes, and delegating where appropriate.
26%
Keep systems simple and usable—paper lists, basic notes, and minimal tools—while rejecting elaborate setup as procrastination.
24%
Externalize tasks, notes, and context through capture, structured inboxes, personal knowledge bases, and second-brain workflows.
18%
Match demanding work to energy, build recovery into the week, and treat sustainable focus as part of the system.
14%
Tone and stance
Performance benchmark
Posts with media make up 48% of this collection. Their median all-time score is 9.04, compared with 13.4 for text-only posts.
Format mix
Consensus and debate
Shared view
Several posts recommend narrowing the day to one consequential task, protecting focused time, and planning before the workday. The consequential task is framed variously as the item that moves the business forward, is closest to revenue, or comes first in the morning.
Shared view
Review rhythms recur as a lightweight maintenance practice: a Friday ritual, a two-week look-back/look-ahead, or a Monday brain-dump-to-Friday-review loop.
Shared view
These posts argue against complexity for its own sake. One proposes retaining complexity only when it creates a valuable insight, output, or decision; others describe returning to simpler tools when elaborate setups create extra work.
Open debate
Some posts lay out extensive AI knowledge and agent architectures, while others caution against systems whose complexity exceeds their output. Together, they present a tension between comprehensive infrastructure and minimal setups.
Open debate
Automation is described as a way to reduce manual, repetitive content work, but another post warns against automating work that does not affect delivery or the bottom line. A separate post observes that personal AI productivity gains have not translated into organizational growth and efficiency as expected.
What performs
The five listed outliers cover workload prioritization and task capture, an AI second brain, organizational AI productivity, protected focus while traveling, and focus recovery. The highest listed outlier, 2038677716741083253, has an all-time score of 942.87.
Lists accounted for 32% of posts and had a median all-time score of 11.7. Opinion posts accounted for 42% and had a median of 11.296, while stories accounted for 26% and had a median of 6.791.
Media appeared in 48% of posts. Its median all-time score was 9.04, compared with 13.36 for text-only posts. This is a descriptive median comparison and does not establish that media presence caused lower performance.
Statistical standouts
Creator landscape
The five most represented creators account for 18% of the selected posts.
1. Pascio
@IAmPascio
2 posts
2. Unfiltered
@quotesdaily100
2 posts
3. Sharran Srivatsaa
@sharran
2 posts
4. Shushant Lakhyani
@shushant_l
2 posts
5. Anna Kulina
@_annakulina
1 post
6. Aporia
@0xaporia
1 post
Sharran Srivatsaa’s two posts advocate short planning horizons: review the prior week, look ahead two weeks, and identify follow-ups, preparation, bookings, or deliverables.
Pascio emphasizes structural conditions for work: time-block deep work, remove phone notifications, plan before the day begins, and make important work unavoidable while making other activity inconvenient.
Shushant Lakhyani’s posts describe an AI second-brain setup with documented workflows and weekly review, alongside Windows shortcuts, desktop organization, and automation options.
Themes, sentiment, stance, and post format are classified per tweet. All counts, shares, medians, creator concentration, freshness, and performance comparisons are then calculated directly from the published snapshot.
Xholic's all-time score compares engagement while accounting for reach, post age, and creator consistency. It is used for relative comparisons within this collection.
This report analyzes the exact 50-post snapshot shown below. AI identifies editorial categories and drafts explanations; all statistics are calculated from the snapshot, and every narrative claim is checked against cited posts before publication.
Best Productivity tweets
Ranked 01–50
@ihteshamali ·
A Stanford PhD student was simultaneously juggling coursework, a teaching assistant position, consulting work, and building the side project that eventually became his company. He didn't write a productivity book about it. He wrote a single blog post that quietly became one of the most referenced pieces of student advice on the internet. I read it carefully, and the framework inside it is completely different from what productivity influencers sell. Here is what a Stanford engineering PhD actually figured out about managing impossible workloads. The first insight was one I had never heard framed this way before. He said to think about your education like a building and think about tests like earthquakes. A building with a weak foundation collapses at even small earthquakes. Most students build the building specifically to survive one particular earthquake, which means they study only what is relevant for the specific test. He called this both unsustainable and dangerous, because there were multiple times during his PhD where he had forgotten how to solve a problem and had to derive the answer from foundational understanding alone. That only works if the foundation is actually there. The second insight was about where your attention goes during a test, and it changed how I think about any high-stakes situation with limited time. He said the professors who want to exhaustively test students deliberately create tests that are never meant to be finished. So the students who do best are not the ones who work fastest they are the ones who read every problem first, identify which ones have the highest return on invested time, and do those first. He called it managing your resource to value ratio, and he scored well on genuinely hard tests precisely because of this. The third insight was the one buried at the end that most people skim past. He said the worst thing you can do on a daily basis is use your active brain to think about small irrelevant things. Every unwritten task sitting in your head is consuming a portion of your mental bandwidth even when you are not working on it. Writing everything down is not just an organizational tactic it is how you give your brain permission to focus on the thing in front of you instead of the twenty things behind it. The fourth was the most counterintuitive one coming from someone managing that many competing demands. He said do not study all the time, because it does not work. Overloading yourself with information past a certain point produces diminishing returns, and the relationships and experiences you skip in the process of grinding are often more valuable to your long-term trajectory than the extra hours of studying ever will be. He was doing a PhD, a consulting practice, a teaching role, and building a company at the same time. And his productivity system fit in a single blog post. The people who are actually doing the most are almost never the ones with the most complicated systems.
@shushant_l ·
📂 how to build your ai second brain ┃ ┣ 📂 foundation ┃ ┣ 📂 daily captures ┃ ┣ 📂 processed inbox ┃ ┣ 📂 para vault ┃ ┣ 📂 memory files ┃ ┗ 📂 ai agent system ┃ ┣ 📂 tool stack ┃ ┣ 📂 claude opus 4.7 ┃ ┣ 📂 claude code ┃ ┣ 📂 claude desktop ┃ ┣ 📂 obsidian ┃ ┣ 📂 para method ┃ ┗ 📂 mcp tools ┃ ┣ 📂 installation ┃ ┣ 📂 install claude ┃ ┣ 📂 setup local folders ┃ ┣ 📂 connect obsidian ┃ ┣ 📂 enable cowork ┃ ┗ 📂 enable local access ┃ ┣ 📂 para vault ┃ ┣ 📂 projects ┃ ┣ 📂 areas ┃ ┣ 📂 resources ┃ ┣ 📂 archive ┃ ┣ 📂 inbox ┃ ┗ 📂 templates ┃ ┣ 📂 memory system ┃ ┣ 📂 claude .md ┃ ┣ 📂 memory .md ┃ ┣ 📂 session logs ┃ ┣ 📂 workflow rules ┃ ┣ 📂 preferences ┃ ┗ 📂 continuity context ┃ ┣ 📂 daily workflow ┃ ┣ 📂 morning brief ┃ ┣ 📂 calendar review ┃ ┣ 📂 meeting prep ┃ ┣ 📂 capture notes ┃ ┣ 📂 process inbox ┃ ┗ 📂 review priorities ┃ ┣ 📂 ai workflows ┃ ┣ 📂 research synthesis ┃ ┣ 📂 writing assistant ┃ ┣ 📂 project planning ┃ ┣ 📂 task management ┃ ┣ 📂 decision support ┃ ┗ 📂 knowledge retrieval ┃ ┣ 📂 session management ┃ ┣ 📂 write session logs ┃ ┣ 📂 track discussions ┃ ┣ 📂 save outputs ┃ ┣ 📂 update memory ┃ ┣ 📂 maintain continuity ┃ ┗ 📂 organize learnings ┃ ┣ 📂 skill building ┃ ┣ 📂 weekly systems ┃ ┣ 📂 reusable workflows ┃ ┣ 📂 markdown skills ┃ ┣ 📂 prompt refinement ┃ ┣ 📂 process optimization ┃ ┗ 📂 execution frameworks ┃ ┣ 📂 organization ┃ ┣ 📂 structured notes ┃ ┣ 📂 searchable knowledge ┃ ┣ 📂 linked thinking ┃ ┣ 📂 documentation ┃ ┣ 📂 knowledge graphs ┃ ┗ 📂 second brain habits ┃ ┣ 📂 productivity ┃ ┣ 📂 faster research ┃ ┣ 📂 smarter writing ┃ ┣ 📂 reduced context switching ┃ ┣ 📂 memory augmentation ┃ ┣ 📂 workflow automation ┃ ┗ 📂 ai collaboration ┃ ┣ 📂 best practices ┃ ┣ 📂 save every session ┃ ┣ 📂 keep folders clean ┃ ┣ 📂 document workflows ┃ ┣ 📂 maintain consistency ┃ ┣ 📂 review weekly ┃ ┗ 📂 build systems gradually ┃ ┣ 📂 mistakes to avoid ┃ ┣ 📂 random note dumping ┃ ┣ 📂 inconsistent structure ┃ ┣ 📂 overcomplicated setup ┃ ┣ 📂 skipping session logs ┃ ┣ 📂 relying on memory alone ┃ ┗ 📂 ignoring documentation ┃ ┣ 📂 long term benefits ┃ ┣ 📂 compounding knowledge ┃ ┣ 📂 faster execution ┃ ┣ 📂 better decisions ┃ ┣ 📂 scalable workflows ┃ ┣ 📂 reduced mental load ┃ ┗ 📂 ai powered thinking ┃ ┗ 📂 scaling your brain ┣ 📂 automation systems ┣ 📂 multi agent workflows ┣ 📂 advanced memory ┣ 📂 personalized ai ops ┗ 📂 lifelong knowledge engine
@robj3d3 ·
Honestly, I'm terrible at staying focused while traveling. Here's how I still manage to ship consistently - my 6-step process: 1) Close Slack, X, and email before touching any code or copy. Notifications are productivity poison. 2) Grab a coffee, open a notebook (not a laptop), and sit somewhere without WiFi for 10 minutes. 3) Write down the 2-3 things that have been living on your to-do list for more than 3 days. Those are always the ones that actually matter. 4) For each one, ask yourself: - "If I only did this today, would I feel like I moved the business forward?" - "Does finishing this make everything else easier or irrelevant?" 5) Pick ONE. Not two. One. 6) Give it a minimum 2-hour uninterrupted block. Not 15 minutes between calls. A real block. New cities and co-working spaces make this harder - which is exactly why you have to protect it harder. The grind isn't actually about doing more stuff, it's about not succumbing to procrastination. That's the whole system.
@nireyal ·
How to regain focus (Hint: The trick isn’t resisting distractions.) Most people think focus is about gritting your teeth OR finding the next productivity hack. But both approaches often make things worse. Why? Hacks create a constant chase for the “perfect system,” which turns into procrastination disguised as productivity. Willpower runs out. The more you fight distractions, the stronger they feel. That’s why the smarter path is noticing urges instead of resisting them. By acknowledging a temptation without judgment, you take away its power. This “before and after” guide is built on that idea. Each “before” pinpoints a common mental state (e.g. unmotivated, anxious, overwhelmed). Each “after” gives you a small, concrete action to reset. 👉 Feeling stuck? Start with just 5 minutes. 👉 Mentally tired? Move your body, even briefly. 👉 Drifting into procrastination? Set a short timer. The result is that you stop fighting yourself and start regaining focus faster and with less effort. Over time, these micro-actions build resilience. You learn not to resist distractions, but to master them.
@0xaporia ·
My greatest productivity bottleneck is my tendency to be seduced by shitty rabbit holes that end up not moving the needle at all. Spent 3 hours on something that shouldn't have been worth more than 30 minutes. Note to self, once again: A system should be as simple as possible to use but as complex as necessary to retain value. If a unit of complexity doesn't drive a disproportionately valuable insight, output or decision, it gets cut. Optimize for marginal utility of information.
@milan_milanovic ·
𝟭𝟭 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝟵𝟱% 𝗢𝗳 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 Here are a few things that I use every day: 𝟭. 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲. Here, I rank my list and select the one big task I want to achieve tomorrow. There could be more tasks, but the fewer you have, the better. 𝟮. 𝗗𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸. Especially when working in a demanding job such as programming, we want to be in a flow state as much as possible. So, I turn off all notifications during these periods and check them once per hour when I take a break. 𝟯. 𝗗𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆. For me, this is during the morning (1.5-2h sessions), but it's different for everyone. I do repetitive tasks and meetings (batched by type) for the rest of the day. 𝟰. 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁. After each day, I reflect on what worked and what didn't. Try to optimize for the next day. 𝟱. 𝗗𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸, 𝗱𝗼. We often think too much about things and do nothing. We need to do things as this is the thing that only counts. Focus on 20% of things that matter (Pareto principle). 𝟲. 𝗦𝗮𝘆 𝗻𝗼 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀. Yes, it's hard, especially for large corporations with meeting cultures. Try to mark your meetings as worth it and then decide if you should go to the next one. And also, make "no" the default for everything that doesn't bring value to your life. 𝟳. 𝗧𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀 such as Pomodoro to stay focused and avoid burnout. 𝟴. 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 to others when possible to free up your time and focus on important tasks. 𝟵. 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. Try to use different tools to automate everything you can automate, especially repetitive tasks. 𝟭𝟬. 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱. As David Allen said, "Your mind is for having ideas, not holding them." Use todo apps for your tasks (Microsoft TODO, Todoist, ...), note-taking tools for note-taking (Notion, Evernote, ...), and techniques such as Getting Things Done (GTD). 𝟭𝟭. 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲. Last but not least. This is the thing that can affect productivity the most. Usually, it needs 7-8 hours of sleep to maintain physical and mental health. Also, try to eat healthily and do some physical activities. Regular walks can do wonders, as scientific research shows. And remember we are not machines, not every day is the same. One day, you will do a lot, and another will be small, but this is a part of the process. Do, reflect, and try to 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝟭% 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗼.
@justinskycak ·
The #1 trick to super-productivity is interleaving a wide variety of productive work that you enjoy. You get tired, bored, and unproductive if you’re moving along one dimension for too long. The solution is to get yourself in a situation where your production function has multidimensional input and all those inputs have large partial derivatives on the same order of magnitude. You follow the gradient in that space by cycling between these component activities. The activities are orthogonal, so whenever you start getting tired, bored, and unproductive from moving along one dimension for too long, you just switch to a different activity, moving along a different dimension. That said, it’s important to remember that “interleaving a variety of productive work” is different from running away from your problems. If you’ve hit a rut on some activity, and you’re switching tasks just to avoid dealing with that problem, and it’s been this way for a handful of cycles, then you’re past the limit of “taking a break to freshen up” and what you really need to do is bunker down and bust through the plateau.
@tankots ·
My team's productivity 2x’d when I started spending one day a month doing what no other CEO does. I can tell you what any of my 45 employees do from 7am to 7pm. Pick anyone on my team. CMO. Support agent. Engineer who started last week. I'll tell you how they start their morning. What gives them energy. What's blocking their best work. What drives them in life. Not from a performance review. From actually sitting next to them and watching them work. Here's why: Most CEOs see their team struggling and bring in consultants. I bring a notebook. I sit with each person. Shadow them for hours. See what their actual day looks like. Not what I think it looks like - what it really is. Then we map the blockers together. And fix them. This isn't about managing them. It's about removing their friction. When I do this, something changes. They don't feel criticized; they feel seen and empowered. The 2x productivity boost is nice. But that's not why I do it. I do it because they stop being employees. They become teammates I actually understand and trust. Here's the truth: Your product will change. Your market will change. Your strategy will change. The only thing that stays with you is your people. So if you're going to prioritize anything, prioritize understanding them. The best CEOs aren't always the smartest people in the room. They're the ones who know exactly what's preventing everyone else from being brilliant. That's the job. — Written with Wispr Flow
@dickiebush ·
Simple productivity system that works for me: > No phone the first 3 hours of the day > Planning my day in full the night before > Using pen & paper to track what I’m doing > Choosing ONE thing to work on first thing > Priming my subconscious with one question before bed
@ben_j_todd ·
Best 'productivity' tip applied recently: take a pure day off once a week, aiming to only do rejuvenating things. It's more recharging than 2 days 'mostly' off, and also means I get a 6th day of peak morning hours. As a relative introvert, for me this looks like: Walk to sauna & cold plunge Tea 2h meditation Big lunch at a fav place, alone or with old friend Maybe journal Long walk listening to music, letting mind wander Do what want for a bit, maybe TV. Or massage or see friends. Early night But you can fill it with anything you find restful or recharging.
@KanikaBK ·
📂 HERMES AGENT ECOSYSTEM ┃ ┣ 📂 00 INBOX & CAPTURE ┃ ┣ 📂 QUICK CAPTURE (VOICE, WEB CLIPPER, MOBILE) ┃ ┣ 📂 FLEETING NOTES (RAW IDEAS, BRAIN DUMPS) ┃ ┣ 📂 DAILY NOTES (AUTO-CREATED) ┃ ┗ 📂 MEETING & CALL LOGS ┃ ┣ 📂 01 PROJECTS (ACTIVE – TIME-BOUND) ┃ ┣ 📂 PROJECT DASHBOARD (MOCS) ┃ ┣ 📂 GOALS & MILESTONES ┃ ┣ 📂 TASKS & SUBTASKS ┃ ┣ 📂 RESOURCES & REFERENCES ┃ ┣ 📂 DELIVERABLES ┃ ┗ 📂 REVIEW & RETROSPECTIVE ┃ ┣ 📂 02 AREAS (ONGOING RESPONSIBILITIES) ┃ ┣ 📂 HEALTH & ENERGY ┃ ┣ 📂 FINANCE & WEALTH ┃ ┣ 📂 LEARNING & SKILLS ┃ ┣ 📂 RELATIONSHIPS ┃ ┣ 📂 PERSONAL BRAND ┃ ┣ 📂 BUSINESS / CAREER ┃ ┗ 📂 HABITS & ROUTINES ┃ ┣ 📂 03 RESOURCES (KNOWLEDGE BASE) ┃ ┣ 📂 LITERATURE NOTES ┃ ┣ 📂 PERMANENT / EVERGREEN NOTES ┃ ┣ 📂 FRAMEWORKS & MENTAL MODELS ┃ ┣ 📂 TEMPLATES VAULT ┃ ┣ 📂 BOOK & ARTICLE SUMMARIES ┃ ┗ 📂 MEDIA & HIGHLIGHTS ┃ ┣ 📂 04 ARCHIVE (COMPLETED / INACTIVE) ┃ ┣ 📂 COMPLETED PROJECTS ┃ ┣ 📂 OLD AREAS ┃ ┣ 📂 REFERENCE ARCHIVE ┃ ┗ 📂 LEGACY NOTES ┃ ┣ 📂 DAILY SYSTEMS (THE ENGINE) ┃ ┣ 📂 MORNING RITUAL / DAILY PLAN ┃ ┣ 📂 ENERGY & FOCUS TRACKER ┃ ┣ 📂 TASK PRIORITIZATION (EISENHOWER + IMPACT) ┃ ┣ 📂 EVENING REVIEW & REFLECTION ┃ ┗ 📂 WEEKLY / MONTHLY / QUARTERLY REVIEWS ┃ ┣ 📂 HERMES AGENT CORE ┃ ┣ 📂 HERMES PERSONALITY & DIRECTIVES ┃ ┣ 📂 AGENT CAPABILITIES & TOOLS ┃ ┣ 📂 CUSTOM INSTRUCTIONS & RULES ┃ ┣ 📂 CONTEXT MEMORY MANAGEMENT ┃ ┣ 📂 MULTI-AGENT ORCHESTRATION ┃ ┗ 📂 HERMES PROMPT LIBRARY ┃ ┣ 📂 AGENT WORKFLOWS ┃ ┣ 📂 IDEA GENERATION & BRAINSTORMING ┃ ┣ 📂 RESEARCH & ANALYSIS ┃ ┣ 📂 CONTENT CREATION PIPELINE ┃ ┣ 📂 TASK BREAKDOWN & PLANNING ┃ ┣ 📂 DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM ┃ ┗ 📂 REVIEW & OPTIMIZATION CYCLES ┃ ┣ 📂 AUTOMATION & INTELLIGENCE LAYER ┃ ┣ 📂 TEMPLATER & QUICKADD SCRIPTS ┃ ┣ 📂 DATAVIEW QUERIES & DASHBOARDS ┃ ┣ 📂 TASKS PLUGIN QUERIES ┃ ┣ 📂 AUTO-TAGGING & LINKING RULES ┃ ┣ 📂 HERMES AUTOMATION COMMANDS ┃ ┗ 📂 CUSTOM SHORTCUTS & COMMANDS ┃ ┣ 📂 FOCUS & DEEP WORK ┃ ┣ 📂 POMODORO / TIME BLOCKING ┃ ┣ 📂 DISTRACTION BLOCKER NOTES ┃ ┣ 📂 DEEP WORK TEMPLATES ┃ ┣ 📂 ATTENTION AUDIT ┃ ┗ 📂 FLOW STATE TRIGGERS ┃ ┣ 📂 DECISION MAKING & THINKING TOOLS ┃ ┣ 📂 SECOND BRAIN QUERIES ┃ ┣ 📂 FEYNMAN TECHNIQUE NOTES ┃ ┣ 📂 PROS/CONS + 5 WHYS ┃ ┣ 📂 PRE-MORTEM & SCENARIO PLANNING ┃ ┗ 📂 IDEA SYNTHESIS CANVAS ┃ ┣ 📂 REVIEW & OPTIMIZATION ┃ ┣ 📂 VAULT HEALTH DASHBOARD ┃ ┣ 📂 PERFORMANCE METRICS ┃ ┣ 📂 BOTTLENECK IDENTIFICATION ┃ ┣ 📂 QUARTERLY SYSTEM AUDIT ┃ ┗ 📂 10X EXPERIMENTS LOG ┃ ┣ 📂 PLUGINS & EXTENSIONS HUB ┃ ┣ 📂 CORE PRODUCTIVITY (TASKS, DATAVIEW, TEMPLATER, CALENDAR, PERIODIC NOTES) ┃ ┣ 📂 VISUALIZATION (KANBAN, EXCALIDRAW, CANVAS, GRAPH) ┃ ┣ 📂 AUTOMATION (QUICKADD, ADVANCED URI) ┃ ┣ 📂 AI INTEGRATION (HERMES AGENT WORKFLOWS) ┃ ┗ 📂 QUALITY OF LIFE (STYLE SETTINGS, ICONIZE, ETC.) ┃ ┗ 📂 SCALING & EVOLUTION ┣ 📂 MULTI-VAULT STRATEGY (IF NEEDED) ┣ 📂 TEAM / COLLABORATION SETUP ┣ 📂 SYSTEM VERSION HISTORY ┣ 📂 10X → 100X UPGRADES LOG ┗ 📂 LONG-TERM LIFE OS ROADMAP
@73lV_ ·
90% of "AI productivity" threads are just tool collecting you don't need 15 AI apps. you need 2-3 good ones used consistently master the basics before chasing the latest features. claude for analysis openai for creativity perplexity for research gemini for image/video generation productivity isn't about tools, it's about more about the systems
@sachinrekhi ·
To me it's obvious that Claude Code should be the primary AI productivity tool product managers focus on. But let me spell out what it offers over chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini: 1. It's focused on generating artifacts - documents, reports, and more. These are exactly the deliverables PMs are responsible for. Instead of just using AI for answering questions, Claude Code enables you to use AI to draft the actual work product you are responsible for. 2. It's all about local context in the form of markdown files - Chatbot memory features are pretty limited and unreliable. But Claude Code is brilliant at reading and leveraging local markdown files. Now when you save and organize this context for Claude Code, you give it infinite context and memory. 3. It's fantastic at workflow automation - Claude Code provides a variety of ways, like skills, agents, and commands, to automate an end-to-end workflow so you no longer have to babysit AI while it works, freeing you up to do higher-level work. 4. It can run any command line tool - This enable's Claude Code to do absolutely anything a computer can do. And it does it even faster than using an MCP server. Incredible for advanced workflow automation. 5. It's amazing at writing code for tasks - Claude Code constantly generates bespoke scripts for me to accomplish tasks efficiently without me even needing to ask it to or understand the code. 6. It avoids vendor lock-in - I have ultimate portability to the next hot agent harness or model because all of my context isn't in a proprietary LLM, it's just on my local desktop. For these reasons I've now shifted the majority of my product work to Claude Code.
@_annakulina ·
This ONE STRATEGY helped me save HOURS daily🤯 A week ago I felt EXTREMELY overwhelmed I felt like everything was too much too fast😓 The building 🧱 The marketing 📲 Creating Content 👾 Filming🎥 Editing👩💻 Assignments for uni 📕 Finals coming up... This list was enough to make me want to curl up in bed and hide away I felt like I took on too many things and was very anxious😥 Where did I go wrong, and why did these feelings catch me now? Then I found the issue... It was the way I have been going about using my time I would work on different things randomly, with no sense of time or distinct priorty👀 This week, I planned out everything alsmot down to the hour⏰ No more guesswork Just structure and deadlines📆 I work best when I have clear goals and expectations that must be met, so I gave myself those conditions for my work. This changed EVERYTHING 🤩 I would no longer waste time thinking of what to work on With time blocking I got more done in 1 hour than I used to get done with 2 or 3 Switching up the things I work on during the day in a structured manner helped increase productivity 📈 If you feel overwhelmed, or like there is not enough time I really suggest stepping back, reflecting on your current work habits and then taking the time to give yourself a little more structure and planning 💪 Of course different things work for different people... So do with this information what you will 😊
@realBigBrainAI ·
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi on the clearest productivity differentiation he's ever seen between engineers using the same tools: @dkhos explains that 90% of Uber's engineers now use AI tools of some sort. But within that group, a smaller set is pulling away from everyone else in a way he can actually measure. "There's about 30% of them that are using them at a completely accelerated pace. And it really is changing their productivity in a way that I've never ever seen before." The way that differentiation shows up is through diffs, the code releases that get pushed to Uber's codebase. "One of the measurements of productivity is just how many diffs are you putting to the codebase. Uber's just a giant codebase. That's what we are." For Khosrowshahi, this matters because of how he sees the role of an engineer at the company: "Our engineers are literally the builders of the company. They are manufacturing the bricks that go into the system. And they're architects who are kind of thinking about what the system should look like." He believes the nature of the job itself is shifting: "I do think that the job of a coder is going to change more and more from actually writing the code to some extent orchestrating agents who are writing the code or building systems for you. It becomes more of an orchestration job versus a manual writing job. But the job will still be there." Crucially, he doesn't see rising productivity as a reason to shrink his team, at least not yet: "If my average engineer became 25% more efficient, which we haven't gone there yet, but we will get there. I'm going to hire more engineers because I want to go faster." But he's candid that this calculus could flip in the future: "5 years from now as the engineers get more and more productive, I may not decide to add engineering headcount because at that point instead of adding an engineer, I should add agents and buy some more GPUs from Nvidia. That may be the investment in the future. We'll see."
@alexabelonix ·
Founders, I recently realized one thing that helped me move faster than most productivity systems ever did Before that, I was constantly busy. > Testing new tools. > Building systems. > Researching things. I always felt productive. But if I’m honest, a lot of that was just preparation. I was preparing to do the work instead of doing the work. Then I started asking myself one simple question: What’s the task closest to revenue right now? And that question changed a lot. Because when you’re building a startup, there are too many priorities. > Product. > Sales. > Fundraising. > Content. > Hiring. > Operations. Everything feels important. But not everything moves the business forward. Now whenever I feel lost, I come back to that question. What’s the task closest to revenue? > Sometimes it’s a sales call. > Sometimes it’s following up with a prospect. > Sometimes it’s fixing a payment issue. > Sometimes it’s shipping something that can finally be shown to users. That’s what I call a Mission Block. And honestly, it’s one of the simplest ways I’ve found to cut through founder chaos
@zuess05 ·
I changed one morning habit and my productivity 10x-ed this week 🤩 Before I even open my laptop, I write every single task down. It stays right in front of me all day. It forces me to prioritize and actually ship. I tried all the fancy productivity tools, but nothing beats the dopamine of aggressively crossing a shipped feature out with a pen ✍️
@shushant_l ·
I'm shocked most people use Windows every day but still waste hours doing everything manually. Here are 10 Windows PC hacks that will save you hours every single week. --- 📂 Windows PC Hacks ┃ ┣ 📂 Keyboard Shortcuts ┃ ┣ 📂 Win + V Clipboard History ┃ ┣ 📂 Win + Shift + S Screenshot Tool ┃ ┣ 📂 Win + D Show Desktop ┃ ┣ 📂 Win + Tab View Desktops ┃ ┣ 📂 Alt + Tab Switch Apps ┃ ┗ 📂 Ctrl + Shift + Esc Task Manager ┃ ┣ 📂 Clipboard History ┃ ┣ 📂 Save Copied Text ┃ ┣ 📂 Store Links ┃ ┣ 📂 Access Images ┃ ┣ 📂 Save Snippets ┃ ┗ 📂 Pin Important Items ┃ ┣ 📂 Snap Layouts ┃ ┣ 📂 Organize Windows ┃ ┣ 📂 Arrange Browsers ┃ ┣ 📂 Manage Documents ┃ ┣ 📂 Arrange Notes ┃ ┗ 📂 Improve Multitasking ┃ ┣ 📂 Virtual Desktops ┃ ┣ 📂 Work Desktop ┃ ┣ 📂 Study Desktop ┃ ┣ 📂 Personal Desktop ┃ ┣ 📂 Entertainment Desktop ┃ ┗ 📂 Separate Workflows ┃ ┣ 📂 Microsoft PowerToys ┃ ┣ 📂 FancyZones ┃ ┣ 📂 PowerToys Run ┃ ┣ 📂 Text Extractor ┃ ┣ 📂 Always On Top ┃ ┗ 📂 Workflow Upgrades ┃ ┣ 📂 Phone Link ┃ ┣ 📂 Sync Smartphone ┃ ┣ 📂 Access Calls ┃ ┣ 📂 Read Messages ┃ ┣ 📂 View Photos ┃ ┗ 📂 Transfer Files ┃ ┣ 📂 Windows Search ┃ ┣ 📂 Find Apps ┃ ┣ 📂 Search Files ┃ ┣ 📂 Open Settings ┃ ┣ 📂 Locate Documents ┃ ┗ 📂 Run Commands ┃ ┣ 📂 Automation ┃ ┣ 📂 Task Scheduler ┃ ┣ 📂 Power Automate ┃ ┣ 📂 File Organization ┃ ┣ 📂 App Launches ┃ ┗ 📂 Repeated Workflows ┃ ┣ 📂 Performance Boost ┃ ┣ 📂 Disable Startup Apps ┃ ┣ 📂 Enable Storage Sense ┃ ┣ 📂 Efficiency Mode ┃ ┣ 📂 Update Drivers ┃ ┗ 📂 Remove Unused Apps ┃ ┗ 📂 Windows AI Features ┣ 📂 Summaries ┣ 📂 Research ┣ 📂 Writing Help ┣ 📂 Creative Tasks ┗ 📂 Productivity Boosts
@EnyonamManye ·
🚜 Farm Productivity Problem: Is It Really About “Lazy Workers”… or Weak Systems? As we approach the end of March and prepare for a new farming season, a familiar concern keeps coming up: 👉 “Farm hands only perform when supervised.” 👉 “It’s difficult to find committed agricultural workers.” But here’s a question worth asking: Is this a people problem… or a management problem? In many cases, farms still operate on: •Informal hiring practices •Daily wage structures with no performance incentives •Little to no training or clear accountability systems And yet, we expect consistency, ownership, and productivity. At the same time, we can’t ignore that: •Some workers lack discipline when unsupervised •There is often low sense of ownership or long-term commitment ⚖️ So where does the real issue lie? Because modern agriculture is evolving into agribusiness, and that shift requires more than just labor — it requires systems, leadership, and aligned incentives. 💡 As we prepare for the next season, perhaps the better questions are: •Should farms move toward performance-based pay or structured contracts? •How can farmers build accountability without constant supervision? •What role does training and workplace culture play in farm productivity? •Are we investing enough in people management as we do in production? 👇 I would value your perspective: In your experience, what drives real commitment on farms — better pay, better systems, or better leadership?
@quotesdaily100 ·
9 WHY YOU ARE ALWAYS BUSY BUT NEVER ACTUALLY PRODUCTIVE: 1. You are confusing movement with progress. Answering messages, attending meetings, and reorganizing your workspace all feel like work because they consume time and energy. But if none of it moves you closer to a meaningful outcome, you are essentially running very fast while standing completely still. 2. You have no clear priorities so everything feels equally urgent. When nothing is ranked in importance, your brain defaults to doing whatever is easiest or most immediately stimulating rather than what actually matters most for your goals. 3. You are constantly switching between tasks without finishing any of them. Every time you shift your attention, your brain requires several minutes to fully re-engage with the new task. Multiply that across a full day and you lose hours to transition time alone without completing anything of real substance. 4. You say yes too easily and too often. Every commitment you accept is a commitment you make against your own time and focus. A full schedule built from other people's priorities will always feel exhausting and will almost never move your own life forward in any meaningful way. 5. You are working without energy management. Scheduling your most demanding and important work during your lowest energy hours guarantees poor output regardless of how many hours you put in. Productivity is not just about time, it is entirely about matching the right task to the right mental state. 6. Notifications are fragmenting your concentration all day long. Every alert, ping, and banner pulls your attention away from deep work and resets your focus. Research consistently shows that recovering full concentration after an interruption takes far longer than the interruption itself actually lasted. 7. You have no clear stopping point for your tasks. Work without defined endpoints expands to fill whatever time is available, a concept known as Parkinsons Law. Without a boundary, a task that should take one hour quietly stretches into three without producing any additional quality. 8. You are spending the majority of your day reacting rather than creating. Emails, requests, and other people's urgencies pull you into a reactive mode where you feel constantly busy but are essentially just responding to whatever arrives rather than building anything of your own. 9. You never block time for thinking. Planning, reflecting, and strategizing feel unproductive because they produce no visible output in the moment. But people who skip this step spend weeks doing work that thirty minutes of clear thinking would have revealed was completely unnecessary from the beginning.
@terencebuilds ·
Stop optimizing your to-do list. Start optimizing your energy levels. Instead of cramming tasks into low-energy hours, I started tracking when my brain actually works Mornings = Deep coding Afternoons = Marketing (when I can handle rejection better) Evenings = Planning tomorrow Productivity isn't about doing more It's about doing the right things when your brain can actually handle them #BuildInPublic
@alvinfoo ·
I stopped taking notes. I started building a second brain. Here’s the system I use with Claude + Obsidian that changed how I work: Most people consume information. They save articles, bookmark threads, attend webinars, then forget 90% of it by next week. I used to do the same thing. Then I built a system that thinks with me, not just stores for me. The stack is simple: → Obsidian (your personal knowledge graph) → Claude (your AI thinking partner) Here’s the workflow: 1. Capture raw — dump notes, articles, voice memos into Obsidian without filtering. Don’t organize yet. 2. Process with Claude — paste your raw notes and ask Claude to: extract key insights, identify contradictions, connect to existing ideas, and suggest what you’re missing. 3. Build atomic notes — Claude helps you compress every idea into one clear paragraph. One idea. One note. Linked to everything related. 4. Weekly synthesis — every Sunday, I paste 7 days of notes into Claude. It generates a “week in review” summary + surfaces patterns I missed. 5. Ask your brain questions — with Obsidian’s graph + Claude’s reasoning, you can literally query your own thinking. “What have I written about AI agents?” → instant synthesis. The result? I don’t just remember more. I think better. My ideas compound. My content writes itself. My decisions are faster because I’ve already done the thinking, I just surfaced it. This isn’t productivity hacking. It’s building intellectual infrastructure. You don’t need a better memory. You need a system that makes forgetting irrelevant.
@lemire ·
Folks at OpenAI promote a 4-day workweek. What do we know about the 4-day workweek? It is wildly popular. Same pay for only 4 days per week? Most people support it. Since the 1970s, we have been told that a 4-day workweek is a win-win because workers would be more productive (more output per hour). Many economists and figures like @elonmusk promise major productivity gains from AI. So it would make sense that a 4-day, or even 3-day, workweek ought to be around the corner. Are we about to work fewer days per week? Here is my counterpoint. Excellence requires hard work. If you work fewer hours, everything else being equal, you learn less and innovate less. Here is what Ko and Choi (2019) found: “The analysis of time-lagged data from 273 firms affirmed that a firm’s overtime level was negatively related to employee satisfaction. However, it was positively related to the firm’s productivity and curvilinearly (inverted U-shaped) related to innovation.” What does it mean? Up to a point, working more hours increases productivity and innovation. What happens if you add AI to this equation? I expect it will only amplify the effect. In a fast-changing world, working fewer hours is a dangerous proposition. We can look for evidence at what OpenAI will actually do. Are they switching to this model for their own employees? Doing otherwise would be hypocritical: “You guys switch to a 28-hour workweek, but our guys will keep working 60 hours.” Some will object: “But, Daniel, there are plenty of academic studies showing that productivity increases when hours are reduced.” Fine. Maybe it is true. But if so, this should matter most for the highest-paid workers, Silicon Valley folks, high-level lawyers, doctors, and so forth. We would expect these people, for whom optimizing productivity is most important, to work fewer hours. Yet, famously, they work longer hours than most. Maybe the entire Silicon Valley should adopt a 4-day workweek. But we all know they do not believe it would make them more productive. There is another side: maybe working fewer days makes people less productive and less innovative, but AI will compensate and it will all even out. This sounds fantastic, we all work fewer hours for the same pay. Until you add the caveat: “and you’ll be subservient to people who keep working long hours, this time using AI.” This is the same lie as universal basic income: “You won’t have to work; the government will give you all the money you need.” Yeah. And you’ll be subservient to the technocrats who decide what you need to do to get the money. There is no shortcut in life. To be free and prosperous: work hard. Speaking for myself, I will keep on working long hours. Do what you will.
@hridoyreh ·
13 productivity hacks for indie hackers: 1. Time-block your entire day. 2. Build before checking notifications. 3. Ship something every day. 4. Follow the 80/20 rule relentlessly. 5. Automate repetitive tasks with AI. 6. Track every hour for one week. 7. Use keyboard shortcuts. 8. Create reusable templates for work. 9. Build an MVP before polishing. 10. Document every process once. 11. Eliminate tools you rarely use. 12. Focus on revenue tasks first. 13. Schedule social posts.
@michalmalewicz ·
I noticed a pretty crazy thing. The more I'm able to do multiple things, the less I am actually finishing. It's like our brain stops us from multitasking too hard. And I don't feel like typical ai-bros are that productive either. It's mostly pretend productivity, something I've lied to myself I'm doing too. Optimizing a process that doesn't move the bottom line in any way is faux-productivity. The more I notice that the more I want to step back and redesign my design approach. Automate SOME things, but not automate for the sake of being on top of the "ai game". Because this game... it's kinda lame and mostly smoke and mirrors. True productivity is not measured by AI generated KPI's, it's measured by what you deliver. WDYT?
@quotesdaily100 ·
THINGS YOUR PRODUCTIVITY IS TRYING TO SHOW YOU: 1. Can't start a task → clarity missing not motivation 2. Finishing everything except the one thing → avoidance wearing productivity's mask 3. Always busy but never done → activity confused with progress 4. Tired by 2pm daily → energy managed poorly in the morning 5. To-do list keeps growing → adding without ever subtracting 6. Multitasking feels productive → attention split is attention wasted 7. Best ideas come in the shower → mind needs rest to create 8. Emails answered immediately → urgency of others running your day 9. Working late every night → poor planning during the day 10. Meetings feel like time theft → they often are 11. Can't remember what you did today → no intentional structure in place 12. Phone checked within a minute of waking → someone else sets the mood of your morning 13. Hard to say no to requests → boundaries around time not established 14. Tasks take three times longer than expected → no honest time estimation 15. Weekend needed just to recover → week not sustainable 16. Always starting new projects → completion muscle is weak 17. Feel guilty resting → rest seen as failure not fuel 18. Mornings wasted on low-effort tasks → prime hours spent on the wrong things 19. Environment full of distractions → space not designed for focus 20. Deadline needed to get anything done → working for pressure not purpose 21. Constantly rearranging your schedule → no anchor habits holding the day 22. Lost the why behind your goals → motion without meaning drains fast 23. Comparing output to others → measuring your chapters against their highlights 24. Nothing delegated ever → control costing you time and scale 25. Quitting just before the breakthrough → discomfort mistaken for a dead end
@andysparks ·
Spent some time this week using Claude and Notion to build a weekly productivity loop for myself. Monday morning brain dump → Friday shutdown review → repeat. Biggest value so far: getting everything out of my head and into a system that actually holds me accountable. Simple enough that anyone could set it up in an afternoon.
@MakadiaHarsh ·
simple productivity system that actually works for building products fast: > no slack or emails until noon > plan tomorrow's tasks the night before > one main feature to ship, nothing else > write everything on paper, not notion > ask yourself one hard question before sleeping
@alexcooldev ·
Unpopular opinion: You don’t need another productivity tool. You need to put your phone down and start doing the work. Notion, Todoist, Obsidian, calendar blocking… You’ve tried them all. The problem isn’t the tools, it’s that you’re confusing “planning” with progress. Execution > Optimization. This post is for the folks with 12 productivity systems and zero finished products. You know who you are.
@pascal_bornet ·
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀. Somewhere along the way, our days became a relay race between screens, and most of us barely noticed because every step felt useful at the time. A message to answer. A meeting to join. A document to finish. A video to relax. One last check before sleeping. I have caught myself doing this too, and the uncomfortable part is that it rarely feels like distraction while it is happening. It feels like productivity, connection, entertainment, or “just five minutes.” That is why willpower is usually the wrong answer. You cannot out-discipline an environment that was built to pull you back in every time you get quiet. Change the environment instead. Put your phone out of reach during deep work, remove the apps that turn boredom into scrolling, make screen time visible, and replace one fast dopamine habit with one slower one: walking, reading, cooking, journaling, or speaking to someone without another device nearby. Attention is not lost in one dramatic collapse. It is traded away in tiny moments that feel reasonable. What is one screen habit you know is costing you more than it gives back? #DeepWork #DigitalBehavior #Productivity #Attention
@pricefoulger ·
I've tried to commit to a strict schedule so many times now and it never last long. A new thing I'm trying is themed days. Mon: Operations Tue: Content and Marketing Wed: Relationships (vendors, subs, customers) and Distribution Thur: Systems and Automations Fri: Keeping Score aka Review Sat: Family / Personal Su: Church and Family I printed this little card out, and it is taped to my monitor. There's obviously some overlap in things I do every day, like sales, responses, customer support, etc but this system seems to help me have a daily focus so I'm not too scattered and overwhelmed. Curious what other people with scattered brains aka ADD/ADHD do, because most productivity advice doesn't seem to stick for me.
@CODEwalkerr ·
Made my own Freedom tracker I can use everyday to keep track of low-high priority tasks. Includes a timer to keep me aligned and accountable to actually make shit happen. The thing I love about vibe coding is taking the baseline structure of something that works and doing your take on what that would look like. This goes into what Austin Kleon talks about in Steal Like an Artist. Not reinventing the wheel, but providing your unique take on things and not just ripping something that is exact and labeling it as yours. Add a new layer instead of copying. @matt_gray_ is a huge inspiration for me in applying system thinking. Do you have time management issues or are you pretty set within your system and workflow?
@MoummarNawafleh ·
i used to measure productivity by how much i could personally get done in a day, but as the team grew that stopped being the right question. now it's about how much i can get out of the people around me anyone going through that shift should pick up high output management by andrew grove
@sharyph_ ·
Here's what a typical Tuesday used to look like for me: → Finish writing the newsletter (2 hours) → Manually write tweets from it (45 mins) → Reformat into a thread (30 mins) → Schedule everything one by one (45 mins) → Try to write a LinkedIn post (give up, too tired) Total: 4+ hours of repurposing content I had already written. Then I asked myself a simple question: Why am I doing manually what a system could do in 30 minutes? I built 5 Claude Code Skills — slash commands that execute exactly how I trained them, every single time, without rewriting a single instruction. The one that changed everything? /tweet — paste any newsletter URL, get 8–12 viral tweet variations in under 2 minutes. Not the same tweet reworded. Real variety: Short punchy wisdom bombs Contrarian takes Story nuggets Question-answer formats Each under 280 characters. No hashtags. No filler. A full week of standalone tweets from one newsletter. The system also threads, schedules, writes authority posts, and optimizes for SEO. One session. One newsletter. Done. This is what working smarter actually looks like...not a productivity hack, but a real operational shift. 📌 Want the full breakdown? I wrote about this entire system in my newsletter, The Digital Creator: https://t.co/Y5oMd3MaPV I help creators and entrepreneurs build lean, AI-powered one-person businesses. ...and it's growing fast.
@MengxueBi ·
Four ways I’ve changed how I work with AI agents Over the past few months, my workflow with Codex and Claude Code has changed significantly. These four changes have given me the biggest productivity boost: 1️⃣ I speak to agents instead of typing prompts Most of my agent interactions now happen through voice—either live voice conversations or dictation with a local @openwhispr model that handles mixed Chinese and English extremely well. This becomes especially valuable when I have several agent sessions running in parallel. Voice removes the final bit of friction: moving my hands between windows, switching input languages, and carefully typing instructions. Speaking freely is also a better way to dump thoughts. I don’t need to organize everything in my head before I begin. I can start talking, discover what I think along the way, and let the agent extract structure from the mess. 2️⃣ I stopped overthinking “prompt engineering” Carefully engineered prompts—with personas, rigid formats, and perfectly defined steps—felt important last year. Today, that approach often feels outdated. Modern agents are surprisingly good at understanding unstructured context. Instead of spending time polishing a prompt, I give them more raw material: scattered thoughts, background documents, previous attempts, references, constraints, and the reasons behind the task. The more context I provide, the more useful surprises I get. Agents can often find connections and insights inside my own rambling that I hadn’t articulated clearly myself. So my current advice is simple: ramble first, structure later. Don’t let prompt engineering become another form of procrastination. 3️⃣ I communicate intent and reusable rules—not pixel-level fixes Instead of saying, “Move this element three pixels,” I explain: What feels wrong What outcome I’m trying to achieve Why the current solution isn’t working What direction I want the agent to explore What principle should apply across the entire project This is especially important for product designers and engineers. Repeatedly correcting isolated details teaches the agent almost nothing. Defining a reusable rule teaches it your taste and allows it to apply that preference everywhere. For example, don’t fix the spacing of ten cards individually. Define the spacing system and ask the agent to audit and update every relevant component. The goal is not to issue more instructions. It is to create rules that eliminate future instructions. 4️⃣ I use Plan Mode much less—and give agents more autonomy When I started using Claude Code four or five months ago, I used Plan Mode constantly. I read every plan before allowing the agent to continue. Now I probably use it once a day. Instead, I often use auto mode or bypass permissions so agents can keep working without waiting for me to click “Approve” at every step. That has dramatically reduced the time I spend staring at a session instead of doing something else. An important caveat: my work is mostly design exploration, storytelling, presentations, and app prototyping. I’m not working with sensitive data, production databases, security systems, or high-risk infrastructure. This level of autonomy is appropriate for my environment—not necessarily everyone’s. The quality of both Codex and Claude Code has also improved enough that I rarely need to review a text plan before work begins. If a task genuinely needs review, I use Lavish to turn the plan into a visual HTML artifact and leave feedback directly on it. 🌰In a nutshell, I’m spending less time operating the agent and more time communicating context, intention, and taste.
@RobRan6116 ·
Most productivity advice says: “Stop multitasking.” But modern work isn’t that simple. The real problem is context reconstruction. Every interruption wipes the mental whiteboard and it takes ~15–20 minutes to rebuild. One simple trick: leave breadcrumbs for your future self.
@DeanDev10 ·
I’ve been wearing many hats recently and doing ALOT of work and seriously, I can’t tell you how much using an effective planner/journal is, I use it on me and two of my AIs for tracking: - how much time is spent - where the time is spent - how much time is available to spend - weekly reports - meetings and providing you notes before the meetings on what you’ve shipped that week It’s something I think alot of men shy away from but honestly, these past two weeks (after burning out) I started using one called Roots and it’s actually sent my productivity through the roof! And it was free to use perfect for bootstrapping projects and staying on task! https://t.co/wpvIGPVVO1
@catalinmpit ·
"The things that matter are the things that scare you. Finding your truth in life. Being a present parent. Writing something honest. Starting a project that might fail in public. They scare you because the moment you actually attempt them, you risk discovering you’re not as good as you’d hoped, and that you might not get there in the time you have left. Work productivity hacks do not scare you though. Inbox zero does not scare you. Calendar tetris does not scare you. Reorganizing a doc does not scare you. Learning how to manage and lead projects and organizations does not scare you. None of these expose you, so you choose them. Gladly. You tell yourself you are being productive and responsible, and you will get to the real thing once the small things are handled."
@o_gabsferreira ·
New Year’s Resolution #1: Going back to Apple Notes. The truth is, I’m tired of trying to be productive using complex tools. Notion and Todoist are incredible, but for my workflow, they create more work than they actually solve. I’m going 100% back to Apple Notes and reviving my old "Master Note" habit: an infinite stream of thoughts, tasks, and daily logs organized by date. I’ll keep separate notes only for what’s strictly necessary (like scripts and articles). This system worked perfectly for me in the past, but I abandoned it to try and be "more productive" with newer tools. Big mistake. Who else uses Apple Notes as their primary productivity tool?
Best Tweets by Topic