Products built with Lovable
Real apps, internal tools, dashboards, and side projects people built on Lovable, from whiteboards and IDE clones to quizzes, SMS platforms, and community maps.
28%
Discover the best tweets about Lovable AI, including prompt-to-app workflows, launches, integrations, production lessons, and builder results. Updated every two weeks.
Real products built with Lovable, practical workflows, limitations, and launch outcomes rather than generic uses of the word lovable.
Original Xholic analysis
The Lovable sample is mostly supportive (70% supportive stance). It centers on showcases of real builds, connector launches, and multi-tool workflows. A persistent counter-current questions whether Lovable apps hold up in production, citing security gaps, SEO and rendering limits, costs, messy codebases, and lock-in. Media posts have a much higher median score than text-only posts. The top outliers include a security checklist, a build guide, and a Stitch-to-Lovable workflow. Only 8% of the sample was published within 90 days.
72% of posts
All-time engagement
22% of posts
Published in 90 days
Conversation map
Real apps, internal tools, dashboards, and side projects people built on Lovable, from whiteboards and IDE clones to quizzes, SMS platforms, and community maps.
28%
Lovable product launches such as Twilio, Twitch, and Telegram connectors, commenting, browser self-testing, CLI and script execution, and image generation.
22%
Whether Lovable is mainly for prototyping and validation, plus concerns about costs, messy codebases, platform lock-in, and comparisons with Claude Code.
22%
Pairing Lovable with Stitch, Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT Agent, PostHog, or other LLMs: design-to-app pipelines, exporting code, and prompting strategies across tools.
20%
Lovable's ARR, valuation, and usage milestones, Anton Osika's story and focus philosophy, and how the internal team builds and organizes itself.
12%
Vibe-coded apps leaking data, missing RLS, auth, and rate limits, plus pre-launch checklists and Lovable's security scanning and pentesting features.
12%
Shared prompts and outputs for generating styled websites and mobile UIs in Lovable, such as Swiss minimalism and neumorphism.
6%
Client-side rendered Lovable sites with indexing problems, invisibility to AI crawlers, and the fixes people recommend.
4%
Tone and stance
Performance benchmark
Posts with media make up 68% of this collection. Their median all-time score is 11.1, compared with 1.86 for text-only posts.
Format mix
Consensus and debate
Shared view
Builders describe working products made quickly: Felix Haas's brand agent in under an hour, Tyler Bruno's multiplayer whiteboard in an afternoon, and Jacob Klug's dashboard for Claude routines. Fil reports that a client built a beauty quiz in an afternoon after being quoted 50k.
Shared view
Many posters treat Lovable as one stage in a pipeline. Examples include Stitch for design and then Lovable; Lovable to kickstart, then exporting to Cursor or Claude Code; and using other LLMs to write prompts, which Vadim recommends after burning $1,000 in credits.
Shared view
Several posters say vibe-coded apps often miss RLS, auth, and rate limits. Prajwal Tomar shares a pre-launch checklist, Anton Osika announces built-in pentesting, Glenn Gabe cites research on exposed data, and Asmit lists missing production layers.
Open debate
Grant Lee argues critics miss Lovable's expanding market, and Nick Abraham says dashboards alone justify using it. On the other side, Jason Zook reports $1,507 spent with zero Lovable products shipped, and Sergio Pereira says a Lovable mockup cannot safely handle client data.
Open debate
Tosin Olugbenga calls building all infrastructure on Lovable a trap. A PM quoted by Matija Sosic felt constrained compared with Claude Code. By contrast, Jacob Klug presents a Lovable-plus-connectors SMS stack as a remixable real product, not a demo.
Open debate
Showcases emphasize speed, but Vaishnavi argues that AI-generated duplication makes cleanup take months. Timo's FocusMap breakdown shows costs of 494โฌ, including 87โฌ for Lovable, exceeding revenue of 322โฌ, though he still sees validation.
What performs
Posts with media make up 68% of the sample and have a median all-time score of 11.07, versus 1.86 for text-only posts. This is a correlation, not proof that media causes higher scores.
The LIST format has a median score of 76.4, the highest of any format, though it covers only 4 posts. The top outlier, Prajwal Tomar's security checklist, scored 348.55, 47.75x the median.
The security and production readiness theme has a median score of 1.86, even though it includes the top outlier. The SEO and rendering limits theme has the highest theme median at 26.59, but it contains only 2 posts.
ANNOUNCEMENT posts have a median score of 21.77, versus 2.322 for OPINION posts. Lovable's Twilio connector post scored 100.5, 13.77x the median.
Statistical standouts
Creator landscape
The five most represented creators account for 20% of the selected posts.
1. Alex Nguyen
@alexcooldev
2 posts
2. Anton Osika
@antonosika
2 posts
3. Felix Haas
@felixhhaas
2 posts
4. Jacob Klug
@Jacobsklug
2 posts
5. Jason Zook
@jasondoesstuff
2 posts
6. Kristian Kyvik
@kkyvik
2 posts
Among top voices, Prajwal Tomar has the highest median score at 251.75, followed by Felix Haas at 122.32. Both posted step-by-step workflow or build guides.
The Lovable account (median 85.17), Anton Osika (35.03), and Kristian Kyvik (22.28) post first-person announcements about features, usage growth, and security launches.
40 creators produced the 50 posts, and the top five placements account for 20% of the sample, so no single voice dominates.
Since the previous snapshot
Themes, sentiment, stance, and post format are classified per tweet. All counts, shares, medians, creator concentration, freshness, and performance comparisons are then calculated directly from the published snapshot.
Xholic's all-time score compares engagement while accounting for reach, post age, and creator consistency. It is used for relative comparisons within this collection.
This report analyzes the exact 50-post snapshot shown below. AI identifies editorial categories and drafts explanations; all statistics are calculated from the snapshot, and every narrative claim is checked against cited posts before publication.
Best Lovable tweets
Ranked 01โ50
@PrajwalTomar_ ยท
Most vibe coders ship apps with ZERO security. Then they wonder why their app breaks at 10 users. Here's the checklist I run before every Lovable launch: โ Row Level Security in Supabase โ Auth flows tested (signup, login, password reset) โ Rate limits on all API endpoints โ Server-side validation on forms โ Environment variables locked down โ CAPTCHA on public forms โ CORS restrictions enabled โ Error handling that doesn't leak data Takes 30 minutes. Saves you from complete disaster. Once you're done, run Lovable's security scan for a final check. Then ship with confidence.

@felixhhaas ยท
I recently built an internal brand agent for Lovable and a lot of people asked how I did it, so here's the exact guide: 1/ Build a brand environment first: I asked Lovable to create a web app where you can view our logo, colors, typography, and all brand assets. This became the database, a single source of truth for everything brand-related. Prompt: "Build a minimal brand hub where team members can browse, search, and download logos, colors, typography, and marketing assets. Should feel like a premium internal tool. Think Linear or Notion. Use placeholder assets so we can replace them later." 2/ Add a home page with an AI agent: I then asked Lovable to build a home page with an AI agent that has access to all of those documents. Prompt: "Add a new page called Brand Agent - a ChatGPT-like chat interface where I can ask questions about our brand." 3/ Connect AI to the assets: The agent can now automatically browse those documents - answering questions, finding assets, and guiding anyone on how to use them correctly. Prompt: "Enable Lovable AI and give the agent access to our brand guidelines. The agent should let users upload a screenshot and tell them if it's on-brand or off-brand with clear reasoning. It should also help find the right assets when asked." The whole thing took less than an hour and it's saving us a lot of time. Hope this helps and now go build you own brand agent today!!

@PrajwalTomar_ ยท
Everyone's sleeping on this Google Stitch โ Lovable workflow. Full design phase in 10 minutes. Then straight into a working web app inside Lovable. Stop wasting weeks on Figma when you can ship this fast. Here's the entire workflow ๐๐ป
@alexcooldev ยท
Build your MVP fast: 1. Use AI builders (Lovable, Bolt New, V0) to kickstart 2. Export the code 3. Keep building in Cursor, Windsurf, or Claude code Ship in days, not months.
@Lovable ยท
You can now connect Twilio to anything you build in Lovable. SMS notifications, WhatsApp messaging, appointment reminders, 2FA, AI voice agents, all from a prompt.

@kirubaakaran ยท
After 17 years in markets, I've seen many shifts. But this one is different. English has become the most powerful programming language. No syntax errors. No Stack Overflow. No debugging. You just need to learn to ask the right questions. If you're a trader still manually scanning Bhavcopy in Excel: Stop. AI tools like Lovable, Claude, Bolt can build your analysis tools in minutes. The barrier to building custom trading tools is now ZERO. I Built a complete NSE Bhavcopy analyzer without coding. Just English prompts with @Lovable ai. AI won't replace traders. But traders who use AI will replace those who don't. And the best way to learn ai is to start using it.
@Lovable ยท
You can now connect your Twitch account to anything you build in Lovable. Stream overlays, alert systems, event production tools, viewer-controlled game mechanics, all from a prompt.

@Kasra_Dash ยท
I've just finished analysing over 6,000 Lovable websites and I found one thing in common. I'll save you thousands of dollars and an endless headache. 1. None of them rank. 2. They all have MAJOR indexing issues because of how they are built. 3. All of them have SEO foundational flaws (incorrect schema, page titles that don't pull through correctly, multiple H1 tags). Sure the website looks pretty. But what good is a nice looking shop on the 15th floor of a warehouse? I'd rather have an ugly shop on a busy high street. Be careful if you're looking to move away from WordPress to an AI vibe-coded website, especially if SEO is your main traffic source. This ain't the way to do it.

@alexcooldev ยท
Build your MVP with vibe coding, without vibe bug fixing: - Start fast with AI builders (Lovable, Claude Code...) - Export your base code - Keep iterating in Cursor, Windsurf - Let CodeRabbit AI handle the reviews Ship ideas in days, not months.
@felixhhaas ยท
Building design tools in @Lovable Introducing our new in-house Connectors tool. Built entirely by one person. @arthurhilhorst from our team has been working on the new Connectors experience inside Lovable. His latest project is an internal tool that manages all connector icons and logos across the product. Sounds simple, but is incredibly time consuming when you're dealing with hundreds of connectors. So he built his custom app: A self-serve platform used across the company to manage connector assets, ensure consistency, and keep everything looking crisp in every scenario. Of course, it also comes with its own AI agent living in Slack. Love seeing how everyone inside the company is becoming a founder of their own mini tools. LFG!
@antonosika ยท
Today Lovable became the first vibe coding tool with built-in penetration testing. Any Lovable-built app can now get the same quality of security testing companies typically pay $5k-$50k for, in a couple hours, for $100 per test, powered by @AikidoSecurity. Our built-in security scanning and platform already get builders far, and now you can prove it with a pentest that supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, client security questionnaires, or investor due diligence. This is a huge leap for safe building.

@kkyvik ยท
You've typed "make sure it works" a hundred times. Now Lovable takes it literally, it can open its own browser and won't stop until it does.
@antonosika ยท
Apps built on Lovable got 20 million visits on International Women's Day. That's 4x as much as four months ago, which means visits to our users' apps quadrupled in the time our ARR doubled. Over 500,000 projects were built on just this day, and an impressive number had backend and payment functionality. I love seeing so many people building real products and getting real usage with Lovable.
@Crownzdesigns ยท
I tested Lovable using a single prompt. To see how good it actually is for vibe coding. Built a design brief generator for freelance designers. Here's the full process.
@thisisgrantlee ยท
Lovable is one of the most misunderstood startups in tech. It gets a lot of flak here on X. "It's just vibe coding." "It's a toy." "Real engineers don't use it." I think these people are missing the point. The thing about big markets is they all start small. Amazon sold books. Shopify was a snowboard shop. The iPhone got laughed at for not having a keyboard. The best opportunities are the ones where a small TAM turns into a massive TAM over time. I think thatโs happening with Lovable right now. What looks like quick prototyping and weekend side projects today is becoming the foundation for a whole new generation of builders. Tobi at Shopify just said it perfectly: "The most AI proof job in the world is entrepreneurship." Lovable is building the workbench for that job. But the bigger thing most people are missing is the shift from software-as-a-service to service-as-software. For years, businesses bought generic SaaS and bent their workflows to fit. Now the cost of building custom software is falling toward zero. That changes the game, especially for SMB and medium-sized businesses. Think about your local business owner. They know their business so well and probably have a thousand paper cuts they wished they could solve or untapped opportunities they wished they could pursue. They might build their own solutions on Lovable, but more importantly I believe there will be a whole new wave of non-technical entrepreneurs stepping in to build agencies that serve exactly these businesses. Bespoke customer interfaces. Agent-powered support. Internal tools that actually fit how a company works. That's a massive latent market getting unlocked. The last piece is structural. Lovable is truly AI native. No legacy code from 2015. No pre-AI UI patterns. No sunk costs to protect. This means they can take bigger swings than the incumbents or the big labs can. Being native to the paradigm shift, sitting in a TAM that's expanding in real time, and carrying zero legacy baggage. That combination is rare. It's how new categories get created. Aspiring founders ask me for advice all the time. One thing I always tell them: study how AI-native founders like @antonosika at Lovable and @matiii at ElevenLabs are executing. They've found markets that are fundamentally misunderstood by most of the industry and they're just rolling full steam ahead. They're not waiting for permission or consensus. They're building while everyone else is still debating whether the opportunity is real. That's the playbook. Find the wave everyone else is underestimating, and ride it harder than anyone thinks is reasonable.

@Jacobsklug ยท
I built mission control for my Claude Code routines. My business runs on automated workflows. The problem: no visibility. I couldn't see what ran, what failed, or what needed review. So I built a dashboard in @lovable to manage it all. 1/ The dashboard Tracks every routine run, skill execution, and output. I log in, see what ran overnight, catch any issues, and review what it created. All in one place. I can also trigger routines on demand from the dashboard. 2/ How I built it Used the Lovable connector inside Claude. Since Claude has full context on my workflows, it architected the build perfectly. Prompted Lovable and handled most of the heavy lifting. 3/ Syncing everything The critical part. I needed Claude routines to talk to the Lovable app. Created a custom MCP for my Lovable project. Now Claude can send data directly to the app. Added a step to each routine that logs runs and outputs via the MCP. Then created API triggers for each routine so clicking "Run Now" in the dashboard fires it back in Claude. That's how you build a Lovable + Claude engine.
@tylerbruno05 ยท
I built a real-time, multiplayer whiteboard fully in Lovable. Real-time sync, cursor tracking, and drawing tools, all built in an afternoon.
@denk_tweets ยท
I spent 6 hours playing with Stitch (Google's new AI design and code tool) the verdict: it's pretty dope. definitely the best design capabilities of any AI website tool I've used caveats: > found a few bugs > can't share the prototype with others without giving them edit access > mostly just frontend and design, can't really deploy it as a full production site (yet) ideal workflow (imo): > start with Stitch to build the frontend design > you can export to figma or export the html/css > import either of those into lovable to refine and deploy for newsletter operators: > can start with Stitch to build a beautiful landing page or subscribe page w/ their design tools > screenshot the output and upload it to @beehiiv AI website builder to replicate it

@SahilPanhotra ยท
Meet Anton Osika, โ Grew up in Sweden โ Studied Engineering Physics and Applied Mathematics at KTH โ Worked as an AI engineer โ Co-founded Sana Labs โ Then co-founded Depict AI โ In 2023, released GPT Engineer โ An open-source project that could generate entire codebases from prompts โ It quickly became one of the most-starred AI coding projects on GitHub โ Realized developers wanted much more than code generation โ Together with Fabian Hedin, started building a product around the idea โ The first launches didn't work โ They kept iterating โ Rebranded everything as Lovable โ Publicly launched in late 2024 โ Anyone could build a full-stack app just by chatting with AI โ The product exploded across X โ Thousands of founders started shipping apps without writing code โ Became one of the fastest-growing software startups ever โ Crossed $100M ARR in just 8 months โ Raised $200M at a $1.8B valuation โ Five months later... โ Raised another $330M โ This time at a $6.6B valuation โ Continued growing at record speed โ Recently surpassed $500M ARR โ More than 50 million projects have now been built on Lovable โ Reportedly raising its next round at a $12B valuation โ Anton still leads Lovable as CEO Imagine if Anton had stopped after the first failed launches Lovable might never have become one of the fastest-growing AI startups in history

@kkyvik ยท
lovable could already write code, we just let it run scripts for everyday tasks too. It can now analyze your data, build your deck, and design your marketing assets.
@cviktore ยท
we gave lovable full cli access to our sandboxes without knowing exactly what would happen within 24 hours the agent used the cli tool for 35% of our users apart from the new capabilities such as ingesting 10,000 records into the database using psql, or creating pdfs, our a/b tests show that lovable is now significantly better at unblocking itself and fewer users chose to revert their changes
@BigBrainBizness ยท
Anton Osika, co-founder and CEO of Lovable: "It's a learned skill to say no." Every founder says focus matters. Almost none of them can tell you where focus lives inside their company. Anton can, and his answer isn't himself: "It comes from how the entire team works together." Here's what that means concretely. Once a week, Lovable's engineers stop building: "Every week, engineers, they don't just take the planned tasks and do them, but they sit down and go through the entire flow of using the product and think about, like, hey, is this actually the best way to do it, and try to polish and simplify and make it as delightful as..." Read that again for who is doing it and how much of the product they touch. The engineers who wrote the code are the ones running the review. No design team, no PM writing a friction document, no researcher summarising tickets. They also walk the whole flow, including the parts they didn't build. Products get ugly at the seams between features, and you only find a seam by crossing it. The ritual exists to solve a problem Anton openly admits is his own: "I think I'm super ambitious about all the things I want to do. And the backside of that is that I do want to do too many things at the same time." @antonosika doesn't claim to have outgrown it. The correction came from repetition: "If you notice, if you work with that over some time, you realise how important focus is." And when he defines the discipline, it's harsher than what usually passes for prioritisation. Not ranking a backlog. Cutting to one: "We have to just pick one thing and do that, and remove as many distractions as possible." All of it points at one target: making the product simple. Simplicity is the only product quality you can't add your way to. It arrives through subtraction, and nobody gets promoted for the feature that didn't ship. So Lovable schedules it. Every week. Whether or not the roadmap called for it. Anton's own verdict on the results: "This is just the beginning, right? So we have a long, long way to go."
@tylerbruno05 ยท
A simple, lightweight VSCode clone built entirely in Lovable. It includes everything you'd expect: syntax highlighting, bracket matching, a file explorer, integrated terminal, find & replace, theme switching, source control, and code folding. It makes me rethink what can be built by anyone.
@jasondoesstuff ยท
This. Is. WILD. I've been wanting to build a faster way for Teachery customers to get their courses started. ~4 hours in Lovable (making the builder) ~8 hours in Claude Code (making it work technically) Holy shit it works!!! ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ I even learned how to push this to our staging environment and it's actually functional. Like... fully 100% works. My mind is BLOWN.
@NickAbraham12 ยท
"all Lovable is good for is building dashboards" my brother in Christ me / my team have spent hundreds of hours building on Lovable and the CLEAR highest-ROI project we've built are dashboards for the team even if that's all it's good for, it's worth using
@CiprianiRanieri ยท
Hey @Lovable community. I built something for all of us. A world map where builders find each other. 762 of us already on it. Built entirely with Lovable in 48 hours. Come find your people. Builders Map โ

@sachinrekhi ยท
Customer discovery via functional prototypes + PostHog is night & day better than the old school way of asking for feedback on Figma mockups. Here's why: I get to observe actual user behavior instead of asking the user to guess how they might use my product. My favorite example of why this matters comes from a Sony Walkman user study. They asked a bunch of people what they thought about a yellow walkman and they said "so sporty! not boring like the black one!". And yet, when they were given the opportunity to take a walkman home after the study, everyone picked the black one. We learned a lot more from user behavior than we did expressed preferences. Here's my setup for now observing user behavior from prototypes: 1. Create a functional prototype in your favorite prototyping tool (Bolt, Lovable, Reforge Build, Magic Patterns, Claude Code) 2. Ask the prototyping tool to integrate PostHog analytics 3. Ask the prototyping tool to instrument key user actions in PostHog Then you get all of these ways of observing actual behavior: - DAUs \ WAUs \ retention curves - I can actually see if people come back and use my prototype instead of taking their word for it - Action metrics dashboards - I can see what actions people are taking vs not - Post-usage survey - I can add a built-in pop-up survey to ask the user a question about the experience after they have engaged with the prototype - Session replays - I can see exactly where people are clicking and how they are using the product to identify usability issues - Heatmaps - I can see what part of my design is working across all sessions I'd never go back to testing with just a mockup after this.

@TimoBuilds_ ยท
My SaaS made money. I built FocusMap for 6 months then launched it on Product Hunt now I did my taxes and saw the costs ๐ญ REVENUE 12 lifetime sales 9โฌ MRR (1 active sub) = 322โฌ total COSTS supabase: 159โฌ cursor: 160โฌ render: 87โฌ lovable: 87โฌ = 494โฌ total RESULT = -172โฌ โฆand I didnโt even include taxes yet ๐ welcome to germany ๐ฉ๐ช ~50% gone on top so the real result? even worse ๐ฉ I just sat there for a moment, staring at those numbers first time people actually paid me for something I built with my own hands I had an idea, built and improved it with feedback inside the app itself and somehowโฆ still in the red but also weirdly it feels like a win even if the numbers donโt show it ๐ validation is there, multiple times for now so I'm not done yet and it still needs work, but I think Iโm on the right path so yeah, I wonโt stop here just need a bit more time ๐

@_vmlops ยท
A dev joined a startup last week opened the repo...went quiet for 2 minutes then said: "what is this." 6 months of cursor + lovable + bolt app works....users are happy...revenue is coming in but the codebase..? 3 different ways to handle the same thing duplicate functions everywhere touch one part...break something unrelated the ai just kept adding nobody was thinking about structure vibe coding is fast to ship slow to scale the generation takes hours the cleanup takes months and that's the part nobody talks about

@jonwu_ ยท
Simple sales collateral workflow: - prompt in Claude - copy edits in Notion - modular Lovable prompt -- has design brief and layouts - customer questionnaire Claude interviews you about the customer, then writes first cut in Notion, generates Lovable prompt. Copy, paste, done.
@robiot ยท
We're introducing commenting in Lovable. You can now collaborate with your team by commenting directly in your apps: Comment -> Discuss -> Ship
@TosinOlugbenga ยท
Building your entire application infrastructure on Lovable is a trap. Use it for your UI. Deploy your Db elsewhere. Deploy your backend elsewhere. Thatโs how you own your application. Donโt build on a rented landโฆ.
@Jacobsklug ยท
I built a full SMS platform powered by AI for local businesses. Here's the entire stack: 1/ @Lovable > Admin dashboard for overview, conversations & triage > Reads from custom knowledge base in app > Crafts responses sent through Twilio > Escalation logic with Slack notifications > No external LLM needed 2/ Twilio (Lovable connector) > Handles SMS for real customer texts > Messages flow into platform > Auto generated edge function and webhook > 2 minutes to configure 3/ Slack (Lovable connector) > Escalation layer for human handoff > Fires notification when AI needs help > Includes customer question and conversation link > Direct response routing This isn't a demo. Remix it in @Lovable. Swap the knowledge base. Sell it to every local business that still answers phones manually. One prompt. Three integrations. A real product in 20 minutes.

@shushant_l ยท
Swiss minimalism design style productivity tool website design. Designed with Lovable. Prompt used: Build a modern productivity tool website in a bold Swiss minimalism style, using a strict modular grid, generous white space, crisp black typography, clean geometric forms, thin borders, and a restrained palette of white, black, and one vivid accent color such as red. Create a striking hero section with a large sans-serif headline, concise value proposition, prominent call-to-action button, and minimal product interface preview. Include sections for key features, workflow, benefits, integrations, testimonials, pricing, FAQ, and a final CTA. Use asymmetric layouts, oversized typography, strong visual hierarchy, flat UI elements, subtle micro-interactions, and precise spacing. Avoid gradients, excessive shadows, decorative clutter, rounded bubbly elements, and generic stock imagery. Make the website feel intelligent, functional, editorial, premium, fast, fully responsive, and unmistakably inspired by International Typographic Style
@aakashgupta ยท
Elena Verna led growth at Dropbox, Miro, Amplitude, and SurveyMonkey. Even she just went back to being an IC. She wrote about it this week. Lovable flattened the org in December. Elena moved back to IC, kept getting paid like a leader, and last week shipped Lovable's enterprise pricing page to prod by herself. That's cool, right? But basically every growth person has prototyped a pricing page with AI by now. The difference: most of us then hand it to the pricing PM, get feedback from stakeholders, loop in a designer, put it on the engineering backlog, get analytics review, and ship weeks or months later. Elena skipped all of it. Her line on the transition: "Did I just level up, or did I just give up status?" My take? Level up. Here's why. Coordination was the expensive part of a leader's job. PRDs, decks, alignment, status updates. Those existed because building was slow and the cost of picking the wrong direction was a quarter. When a working prototype takes an afternoon, three layers of approval just become overhead. Elena has a name for this new role: the High-Impact IC. Or, HI-C. A solo operator who takes a project from problem to production without coordinating three teams. I love this. Because about 90% of her time is now building. Almost no meetings. The skill stack underneath: pointy in one area, competent in the adjacent ones. Elena is pointy in growth, competent in analytics, design, and code. For HI-C to actually exist inside a company, two things have to be true. HI-Cs need the same information access senior leaders had. And companies have to be willing to recruit senior leaders into IC roles. Comp parity finally makes the conversation possible. If you're a senior leader who quietly misses the building part of the job, forward this post to your CEO. The shift from Product Manager or Growth Manager to Product Builder is here. Whether you like it or not.

@SergioRocks ยท
If youโre a non-technical Founder, you can now do a lot before hiring Engineers. A few years ago, starting a tech startup meant: - raise money - hire a team - build for months - then show something to clients That playbook has changed. Today, with tools like ChatGPT, Claude and Lovable, you can: - explore the market - define personas and ICPs - map workflows - build clickable mockups - put something in front of potential clients For less than $100/month in subscriptions. That is incredible! You no longer need funding just to find out whether anyone cares about your startup. But thereโs a trap. A prototype is not a product. A Lovable mockup can help you validate interest. It cannot safely handle: - client data - permissions - scaling - integrations - security - production edge cases So the new playbook is not โAI replaces engineeringโ. Itโs: Use AI to validate faster. Then bring in technical depth when the product starts to matter. I wrote a full breakdown for non-technical founders in my latest newsletter. https://t.co/8x2WDyXUtw
@glenngabe ยท
Shocking! :) Be careful with those vibe-coded apps -> Researchers: 5K+ web apps built using AI coding tools like Lovable, Base44, and Replit had little to no authentication, and ~40% of them exposed sensitive data "When those same vibe-coding tools invite anyone to create applications hosted on the web with a click, however, it turns out the security implications go beyond bugs to a total absence of any securityโeven, sometimes, for highly sensitive corporate and personal data." "Of the 5,000 AI-coded apps that Zvi says were left publicly accessible to anyone who simply typed their URLs into a browser, he found close to 2,000 that, upon closer inspection, seemed to reveal private data" https://t.co/rGsKUp8qFT
@shushant_l ยท
Neumorphism / soft UI design style productivity mobile app. Created with Lovable Prompt used: Build a premium mobile productivity app using a modern Neumorphism / Soft UI design style, featuring softly raised and recessed interface elements, subtle realistic shadows, rounded corners, smooth surfaces, gentle depth, and a calm neutral color palette with one vibrant accent color. Create an intuitive dashboard for tasks, habits, focus sessions, calendar events, goals, and daily progress, with tactile buttons, floating controls, elegant progress indicators, minimal icons, and spacious typography. Use soft cards that appear naturally molded into the background while maintaining strong contrast, accessibility, and clear visual hierarchy. Add subtle micro-interactions, satisfying press states, fluid animations, and smooth screen transitions. Keep the experience clean, distraction-free, warm, modern, highly usable, and visually satisfying, avoiding excessive shadows, clutter, gradients, and overdecorated interfaces
@foley_seo ยท
Lovable hit $20m ARR in 2 months. 25 million projects shipped. Fastest-growing European startup ever. There's just one small problem, well, we say small, we mean HUGE! Almost none of these sites are SEO friendly by default. And in 2026, that's a much bigger deal than it sounds. Here's the structural issue most "build a site in 60 seconds" pitches skip over: โ Lovable, Bolt and v0 ship client-side rendered React apps by default. The HTML Google receives is essentially <div id="root"></div>. An empty shell. โGoogle CAN render JavaScript, but rendering is ~9x more resource-intensive. Onely's research shows around 32% of JS-dependent content stays unindexed a month after URL discovery. โWe've tested this. One Lovable build: 50 URLs, 9 indexed over 3 months, all with duplicate metadata. โThe bigger 2026 problem - GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot do NOT execute JavaScript. At all. They fetch the raw HTML and move on. Your product descriptions, pricing, FAQs, case studiesโฆ invisible. โOpen Graph previews on LinkedIn, X, Slack? Same story. Blank cards. Social platforms don't run JS either. โWorst part: when AI can't access content, it fabricates. We tested it with locked PDFs - the model invented what it "saw". Vibe coded sites behave the same way to AI crawlers. You can rank on Google (eventually, once the render queue catches up) AND be completely absent from AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity at the same time. That's the split visibility problem. It's getting worse with every Gemini update. The fix isn't "stop using AI tools." It's specifying the rendering model up front. Next.js, App Router, real anchor tags, server-side metadata, structured data in the raw HTML - all of which Cursor or Claude Code will scaffold for you in minutes if you prompt properly. My full breakdown - the architecture problem, the workarounds for sites already built on Lovable/Bolt, and the prompts to use for an SEO-ready scaffold from day one ๐ https://t.co/N2yh4E7ROc
@MatijaSosic ยท
I spoke to a PM who built his SaaS from scratch with Wasp. I asked: why not Lovable/Replit? "I tried it, but felt like I was arguing with a middleman. With Claude Code, I feel like I have a coworker - a junior, but a coworker. With Lovable it felt like I'm writing to an agency, like some sales guy trying to sell me. I felt constrained, like in a box." Owning the process vs outsourcing it. That's the difference.
@thebuggeddev ยท
Waitโฆ @Lovable actually generated images on the fly while generating the code without me even writing a prompt for it ๐ฑ Never seen a vibe coding tool do that before. It did it just by referencing the attached design image. No MCP SIM SIPPY. In fact, it even one shotted the design I shared for this mobile app and built a mobile first version since Expo is not supported yet. This is seriously amazing work by Lovable!!
@devansh_bordia ยท
Your Lovable, Bolt, or v0 app took a weekend to ship. It took us one afternoon to find its data leaking. We reviewed a stack of vibe-coded SaaS apps built with Cursor, Lovable, https://t.co/JYEWFNDb3z, and discovered 10 common patterns that almost all the applications repeated If you shipped fast with any of them, there's a good chance you're sitting on one of these right now. Findings, A Thread ๐งต:
@BallinFil ยท
My client was quoted 50k for a custom beauty quiz with a 2-month lead time. Simple workflow (bunch of questions + scoring criteria pushing to best-sellers and categories) + dynamic Klaviyo metric push to fire a post-quiz email. He vibe-coded it himself with lovable in an afternoon (no exaggeration). Saved his company a ton of money and got the project out insanely fast. It might not be as sophisticated as the quiz company, but he can iterate into sophistication overtime. This is the future...
@coolcoder56 ยท
The demo was clean. The UI was sharp. The deploy worked. I genuinely thought I was done. Then real users showed up. And everything I never built started breaking. โ Auth flows leaked data because RLS was never set up โ The API got hammered with zero rate limiting โ Errors piled up silently with nothing tracking them โ The database slowed to a crawl on its first real query What looked like a finished product was actually frontend and backend sitting on top of 11 missing layers. The stuff nobody shows in the launch tweet: โ Auth and permissions โ Hosting and deployment โ Cloud and compute โ CI/CD and version control โ Security and Row Level Security โ Rate limiting โ Caching and CDN โ Load balancing and scaling โ Error tracking and logs โ Database hardening โ Availability and recovery None of this lives in a Lovable preview. None of it shows up in a Cursor screen recording. But all of it is what separates a working demo from a product real people pay for. Vibe coding is incredible for proving an idea. It turns weeks of work into hours. But shipping a real product still needs real engineering. Pretending otherwise is how startups end up with 10,000 users and an app that crashes on Tuesday morning. Use vibe coding to validate fast. Then build the layers underneath that actually keep it alive.

@jasondoesstuff ยท
Any Lovable users relate? Lovable expense so far this year: $1,507 Claude Code expense so far: $820 Lovable products shipped: 0 ๐ฌ Claude Code products shipped: 3 ๐ As much as I love what Lovable's built, I'm not entirely sure it's better for much more than prototyping.
@gaganghotra_ ยท
Simple annotating live webpages application - I cooked couple of weeks back using Lovable has been so helpful to discuss things with devs/designers micro projects to do micro things seems like the real value creation using AI rather than trying to build large scale end to end automations which need crazy supervision cuz of hallucinations compounding from one component to another

@houstongolden ยท
I just gave ChatGPT Agent access to a new project in @lovable it's going through a massive PRD with phases, tasks, sub-tasks to build it to spec until done. Would take me days just to do this myself even in Lovable or bolt just to oversee and wait for each completion.
@CarolMonroe ยท
.@Lovable shipped a new preview commenting update today At first, I thought I'd compare it to other tools, but it's more than that. Lovable actually executes the comments. You can click anything in the UI, leave feedback, and keep building without breaking your flow. You can point what matters, ask lovable to fix it, and keep moving.
@VadimStrizheus ยท
If youโre a vibe coder in 2025, donโt make the mistake that cost me $1,000. Donโt just use Lovable, Replit, Bolt, etc. Pair those platforms with other LLMs like Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Outsourcing prompts and code generation to these LLMs, then pasting into vibe coding platforms, is a game changer. I burned through $1,000 in Lovable credits because I thought the platform alone was enough. Itโs not. You need other LLMs to help you.
@Creator_Toolbox ยท
Lovable added Telegram integration, allowing you to: - Connect chatbots - Group alerts - Order updates - Customer support to anything you built All from a prompt.

Best Lovable tweets
Xholic studies what works in your niche, drafts posts in your voice and schedules them for the hours your audience is online.
No card needed ยท Nothing to cancel
Browse all tweet collectionsLive demo: no sign-up or login needed ยท takes about 2 minutes
Keep exploring